Welcome to Edura Online Learning & Education Platform
Please add some widget in Offcanvs Sidebar
Welcome to Edura Online Learning & Education Platform
ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Guide Quiz helped over 98 percent of exam candidates get the certificate. Before you really attend the ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam and choose your materials, we want to remind you of the importance of holding a certificate like this one. Obtaining a ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager certificate likes this one can help you master a lot of agreeable outcomes in the future, like higher salary, the opportunities to promotion and being trusted by the superiors and colleagues.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
>> ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Exam Tips <<
The successful outcomes are appreciable after you getting our ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam prep. After buying our ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager latest material, the change of gaining success will be over 98 percent. Many exam candidates ascribe their success to our ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager real questions and become our regular customers eventually. Rather than blindly assiduous hardworking for amassing knowledge of computer, you can achieve success skillfully. They are masterpieces of experts who are willing to offer the most effective and accurate ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Latest Material for you.
NEW QUESTION # 71
What is the primary objective of an awareness program?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
The core purpose of a security awareness program, as outlined in ISO/IEC 27035 and ISO/IEC 27001, is to influence behavior and attitudes toward security, making staff more conscious of threats and their responsibilities in preventing incidents. An effective awareness program helps reduce human errors, enhances response readiness, and builds a security-conscious culture.
ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016 clearly differentiates awareness from training. While training focuses on skills and procedures, awareness is about shaping the mindset, ensuring that employees understand the importance of security in their daily tasks.
Option A (technology introduction) and option C (IT efficiency) are not primary goals of awareness programs.
Reference Extracts:
ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 7.3.1: "The objective of awareness activities is to change behavior and enhance understanding of security threats and how to prevent them." ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Control 6.3 and Annex A: "Personnel should be made aware of the importance of information security and their responsibilities in supporting it." Correct answer: B
-
NEW QUESTION # 72
Scenario 7: Located in central London, Konzolo has become a standout innovator in the cryptocurrency field.
By introducing its unique cryptocurrency, Konzolo has contributed to the variety of digital currencies and prioritized enhancing the security and reliability of its offerings.
Konzolo aimed to enhance its systems but faced challenges in monitoring the security of its own and third- party systems. These issues became especially evident during an incident that caused several hours of server downtime This downtime was primarily caused by a third-party service provider that failed to uphold strong security measures, allowing unauthorized access.
In response to this critical situation, Konzolo strengthened its information security infrastructure. The company initiated a comprehensive vulnerability scan of its cryptographic wallet software, a cornerstone of its digital currency offerings The scan revealed a critical vulnerability due to the software using outdated encryption algorithms that are susceptible to decryption by modern methods that posed a significant risk of asset exposure Noah, the IT manager, played a central role in this discovery With careful attention to detail, he documented the vulnerability and communicated the findings to the incident response team and management.
Acknowledging the need for expertise in navigating the complexities of information security incident management. Konzolo welcomed Paulina to the team. After addressing the vulnerability and updating the cryptographic algorithms, they recognized the importance of conducting a thorough investigation to prevent future vulnerabilities. This marked the stage for Paulina s crucial involvement. She performed a detailed forensic analysis of the incident, employing automated and manual methods during the collection phase. Her analysis provided crucial insights into the security breach, enabling Konzolo to understand the depth of the vulnerability and the actions required to mitigate it.
Paulina also played a crucial role in the reporting phase, as her comprehensive approach extended beyond analysis. By defining clear and actionable steps for future prevention and response, she contributed significantly to developing a resilient information security incident management system based on ISO/IEC
27035-1 and 27035-2 guidelines. This strategic initiative marked a significant milestone in Konzolo's quest to strengthen its defenses against cyber threats According to scenario 7, what type of incident has occurred at Konzolo?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
Severity classification of an incident under ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016 is determined by factors such as potential data exposure, business disruption, and impact on critical services. In this scenario, the server downtime caused by a third-party breach and a vulnerability in cryptographic wallet software-capable of leading to asset exposure-signifies serious business and operational risks.
Although the vulnerability was critical, no actual asset theft or breach was confirmed. Therefore, while serious, the incident does not reach the "critical" threshold (which would typically involve data exfiltration, irreversible loss, or public impact). The appropriate classification is "High Severity." Reference:
* ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 6.3.1: "Severity is determined by the actual or potential impact on business operations, data, reputation, and legal obligations."
* Annex A (Example Severity Levels): "High-severity incidents involve confirmed vulnerabilities with significant potential for impact, such as financial loss or regulatory violations." Correct answer: B
-
NEW QUESTION # 73
What does the Incident Cause Analysis Method (ICAM) promote?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
The Incident Cause Analysis Method (ICAM) is a root cause analysis technique used across various industries, including cybersecurity, to understand underlying issues behind incidents. It promotes a holistic and structured approach by examining five critical dimensions:
People (human error, behavior, awareness)
Environment (physical or digital conditions)
Equipment (hardware, software, tools)
Procedures (policies, guidelines, workflows)
Organization (culture, leadership, resourcing)
This comprehensive model helps organizations identify both immediate and systemic causes, allowing them to implement more effective corrective actions and prevent recurrence.
Reference:
ICAM Framework (adapted for cyber from industrial safety): "The ICAM methodology provides a structured approach to incident analysis using five contributing factor categories." ISO/IEC 27035-2 supports root cause analysis practices as part of the post-incident review (Clause 6.4.7).
Correct answer: A
-
NEW QUESTION # 74
Scenario 6: EastCyber has established itself as a premier cyber security company that offers threat detection, vulnerability assessment, and penetration testing tailored to protect organizations from emerging cyber threats. The company effectively utilizes ISO/IEC 27035*1 and 27035-2 standards, enhancing its capability to manage information security incidents.
EastCyber appointed an information security management team led by Mike Despite limited resources, Mike and the team implemented advanced monitoring protocols to ensure that every device within the company's purview is under constant surveillance This monitoring approach is crucial for covering everything thoroughly, enabling the information security and cyber management team to proactively detect and respond to any sign of unauthorized access, modifications, or malicious activity within its systems and networks.
In addition, they focused on establishing an advanced network traffic monitoring system This system carefully monitors network activity, quickly spotting and alerting the security team to unauthorized actions This vigilance is pivotal in maintaining the integrity of EastCyber's digital infrastructure and ensuring the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of the data it protects.
Furthermore, the team focused on documentation management. They meticulously crafted a procedure to ensure thorough documentation of information security events. Based on this procedure, the company would document only the events that escalate into high-severity incidents and the subsequent actions. This documentation strategy streamlines the incident management process, enabling the team to allocate resources more effectively and focus on incidents that pose the greatest threat.
A recent incident involving unauthorized access to company phones highlighted the critical nature of incident management. Nate, the incident coordinator, quickly prepared an exhaustive incident report. His report detailed an analysis of the situation, identifying the problem and its cause. However, it became evident that assessing the seriousness and the urgency of a response was inadvertently overlooked.
In response to the incident, EastCyber addressed the exploited vulnerabilities. This action started the eradication phase, aimed at systematically eliminating the elements of the incident. This approach addresses the immediate concerns and strengthens EastCyber's defenses against similar threats in the future.
Based on scenario 6, EastCyber's team established a procedure for documenting only the information security events that escalate into high-severity incidents. According to ISO/IEC 27035-1, is this approach acceptable?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016 clearly states that documentation is essential for all information security incidents, regardless of severity. While prioritization is necessary, the standard recommends that events meeting the threshold of an information security incident (based on classification and assessment) must be recorded, along with the corresponding actions taken.
The practice described-documenting only high-severity incidents-may result in overlooking patterns in lower-priority events that could lead to significant issues if repeated or correlated.
Clause 6.4.5 of ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016 emphasizes that documentation should be thorough and begin from the detection phase through to response and lessons learned.
Option A is incorrect, as the standard does not permit selective documentation only for severe incidents.
Option C misrepresents the intent of documentation, which must be concurrent with or shortly after incident handling-not only post-event.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016, Clause 6.4.5: "All incident information, decisions, and activities should be documented in a structured way to enable future review, learning, and audit." Clause 6.2.3: "When an event is assessed as an incident, it must be recorded along with all subsequent actions." Correct answer: B
-
NEW QUESTION # 75
During the 'detect and report' phase of incident management at TechFlow, the incident response team began collecting detailed threat intelligence and conducting vulnerability assessments related to these login attempts.
Additionally, the incident response team classified a series of unusual login attempts as a potential security incident and distributed initial reports to the incident coordinator. Is this approach correct?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
The 'detect and report' phase, as defined in ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016 (Clause 6.2), includes the identification, classification, and initial reporting of information security events. If events meet certain thresholds-such as multiple failed login attempts from unknown IP addresses or matching threat indicators-they can and should be classified as potential incidents.
It is also appropriate to begin collecting supporting information during this phase. Gathering threat intelligence and performing basic vulnerability assessments help in confirming the scope and nature of the threat, allowing faster escalation and response.
Option B is incorrect because while deep forensic collection occurs later, preliminary data collection should begin during detection. Option C is incorrect as incident classification is explicitly allowed and encouraged in this phase.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016, Clause 6.2.2: "Events should be assessed and classified to determine whether they qualify as information security incidents." Clause 6.2.3: "All relevant details should be collected to support early classification and reporting." Correct answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 76
......
In addition to the environment, we also provide simulations of papers. You really have to believe in the simulation paper of our ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager study materials. With our ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager practice engine, you can know that practicing the questions and answers are a enjoyable experience and it is an interactive system. If you are answering the questions rightly, then the result will show right, and if you choose the wrong answer, then it will show wrong. And when you finish the ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Exam Questions, the scores will come up as well.
Downloadable ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager PDF: https://www.dumpstillvalid.com/ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager-prep4sure-review.html